Espinoza

(PC) Guy v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20191:19-cv-00498California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JAMESETTA GUY, Case No. 1:19-cv-00498-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

J. ESPINOZA, et al., (ECF NO. 10)

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, Jamesetta Guy, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2019, Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and Jane Doe 1-500, filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because the case is meritorious, because she and Jane Doe 1-500 needs assistance in presenting the case, and because she and Jane Doe 1-500 have suffered irreparable harm as a result of Defendants’ actions. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.