Kernan

(PC) Harris v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20192:17-cv-00680California966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical claims against defendant Dr. Kuersten. (ECF No. 22 at 9- 10.) By order filed August 1, 2019, plaintiff’s motion to compel further response to request for production of documents No. 14 was denied. On August 19, 2019, plaintiff objected to such denial. The undersigned construes plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration of the order denying further production. Upon reconsideration, as set forth below, plaintiff’s request for further production is denied. REQUEST NO. 14: All documents, rules and procedures describing the functions of the daily medical “Huddle.” (sp?) 25 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14: There are no documents responsive to this request. (ECF No. 59…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.