Ogamba

Ogamba v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20192:17-cv-01754California6,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 URSULA OGAMBA, No. 2:17-cv-01754-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Ursula Ogamba contends her home was wrongfully sold in a 2017 foreclosure sale. She sues her loan servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging multiple violations of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights (“HBOR”), as well as state law claims. Wells Fargo moves for summary judgment on each of Ogamba’s claims. Mot., ECF No. 52. Ogamba opposes, Opp’n, ECF No. 58, and Wells Fargo replies, Reply, ECF No. 63. As explained below, the court GRANTS Wells Fargo’s motion in full.1 ///// ///// 24 1 On the morning of December 7, 2018, shortly before the court was set to hear this motion, an 25 assistant for Ogamba’s counsel advised the court that counsel was ill, would not attend the hearing and wished to submit the motion on the papers or reschedule the hearing. Given that the court had prepared for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.