Diaz

(PC) Jackson v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20191:17-cv-00027California2,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 11 DEMORIA JACKSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00027-DAD-JDP

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

v. ECF No. 40 RALPH M. DIAZ, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 17 18 Plaintiff Demoria Jackson is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against defendant Lunes for a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On November 20, 2018, defendant Lunes moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, arguing that defendant did not violate plaintiff’s due process rights and is entitled to qualified immunity. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff filed an opposition on March 18, 26 27 1 As explained below, I find in favor of defendant on the merits of the due process argument, 28 2019, ECF No. 45, and defendant filed a reply on March 22, ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.