King

(PC) Chester v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20191:16-cv-01257California3,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING

vs. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 29.) AUDREY KING, et al.,

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT BRADLEY

Defendants. POWERS, M.D., TO PROVIDE

VERIFICATION OF INTERROGATORIES

TO PLAINTIFF WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint against defendants Audrey King (Executive Director), Jagsir Sandhu, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer), Bradley Powers, M.D. (Unit Physician), and Robert Withrow, M.D. (Medical Director of CSH) for providing inadequate medical treatment to Plaintiff in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 10.) On December 19, 2018, the court issued a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.