King
(PC) Chester v. King
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20191:16-cv-01257California3,196 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING
vs. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 29.) AUDREY KING, et al.,
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT BRADLEY
Defendants. POWERS, M.D., TO PROVIDE
VERIFICATION OF INTERROGATORIES
TO PLAINTIFF WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
17 I. BACKGROUND Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint against defendants Audrey King (Executive Director), Jagsir Sandhu, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer), Bradley Powers, M.D. (Unit Physician), and Robert Withrow, M.D. (Medical Director of CSH) for providing inadequate medical treatment to Plaintiff in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 10.) On December 19, 2018, the court issued a…