Arabia

(PC) Johnson v. Arabia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20192:18-cv-02221California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY CHARLES JOHNSON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2221 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND JOHN ARABIA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On July 25, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that plaintiff may proceed on a claim for excessive force arising under the Fourth Amendment against defendants Arabia, Williams, Lee and Warren as detailed on pages 13 and 14 of plaintiff’s complaint. With respect to the other defendants and the other claims identified in plaintiff’s complaint, the court found that plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court informed plaintiff he could either proceed on the claims described above or file an amended complaint in an attempt to cure the deficiencies in the original. Plaintiff has indicated he would like to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.