(SS) Liscano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20191:18-cv-00431California1,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARD LISCANO, Case No. 1:18-cv-00431-BAM 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR v. FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE ANDREW M. SAUL,1 Commissioner of Social Security, (Doc. No. 23)

15 Defendant.

16 I. Background On March 29, 2018, Plaintiff Bernard Liscano (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his social security benefits. (Doc. No. 1.) On April 25, 2018, this Court entered a scheduling order in this action. (Doc. No. 7.) Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, Plaintiff was required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 95 days from the date of service of the administrative record by Defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.