Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:18-cv-02956-JAM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 16 Before the court is Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s motion to stay proceedings against Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”) pending appeal of two related cases: Johnson v. Blackhawk Centercal (3:17-cv-02454-WHA)(“Centercal”) and Nehemiah Kong v. Mana Investment Company, LLC (8:18-cv-01615-DOC-DFM)(“Mana”). Mot. to Stay (“Mot.”), ECF No. 12, 12-4, 12-5. Defendant opposed Plaintiff’s motion and Plaintiff filed a reply. Opp’n, ECF No. 13; Reply, ECF No. 14. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.1
1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for July 30, 2019. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS In…