Kernan

(PS) Alford v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20192:19-cv-00732California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKEY LOUIS ALFORD, No. 2:19-cv-00732 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN and RICKY TAYLOR, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 23, 2019, the court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, dismissing the case with prejudice. ECF No. 5. However, on July 16, 2019—between the filing of the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and the court’s July 23, 2019 order—plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF No. 4. On July 30, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations regarding the TRO motion which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.