(SS) Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20192:18-cv-01405California3,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELENE BROWN, No. 2:18-cv-01405 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) finding that plaintiff’s disability under sections 216(i) and 223(f) of the Social Security Act (“Act”) ended on October 15, 2014, and that plaintiff has not become disabled again since that date. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Commissioner’s cross- motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1962, was found disabled beginning on January 1, 2005. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 16, 27. The September 21, 2005 decision finding plaintiff disabled stated that she had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.