Cortes

Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20191:18-cv-00909California176 words

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANGELICA CORTES, INDIVIDUALLY, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00909-JLO-JLT AND BY AND THROUGH HER

GUARDIAN AD LITEM GUSTAVO ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

12

CORTES, AND GUSTAVO

13 Plaintiff, v.

KERN COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS and Does, Defendant.

17 The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 29) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 79), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: August 27, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27