Foster

Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20191:19-cv-00987California4,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE

TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE (ECF No. 7) OPERATIONS, et al., THIRTY DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, a screening order was filed finding that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 5.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed August 23, 2019. (ECF No. 7.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.