(SS) Lugo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20191:18-cv-00807California4,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADOLFO LUGO, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-0807 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G) v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ADOLOFO LUGO AND ) AGAINST DEFENDANT, THE COMMISSIONER Defendant. ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) )

Adolfo Lugo asserts he is entitled to benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in her evaluation of the vocational evidence in the action. Because the ALJ failed to apply the proper legal standards and ignored significant, probative evidence in the record, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). BACKGROUND On May 19, 2014, Plaintiff filed an application a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.