Pringle

Pringle v. Cardall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20192:18-cv-02035California4,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE, No. 2:18-cv-2035 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

AND IMPROPER VENUE

BRENT CARDALL, COUNTY OF YOLO,

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY PENNELLA,

SANDY JONES, AMANDA GENTRY, NOEL

BARLOW-HUST, JUDY MESICK, CINDY McDONALD, MARK ALAN KUBINSKI, ELISA SUE MAGNUSON, JOHN DOES 1- 20, and JANE DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. 21 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Pamela Pringle filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that defendants violated her civil rights during and after her incarceration in Idaho Department of Correction (“IDOC") facilities. Defendants Sandy Jones, Amanda Gentry, Noel Barlow-Hust, Judy Mesick, Cindy McDonald, Mark 28 Kubinski, and Elisa Magnuson (collectively “the Idaho defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (Docket No. 53.) I. Background A. Factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.