(PC) Warfield v. California Attorney Generals Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20192:17-cv-02544California1,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK WARFIELD, No. 2:17-cv-2544 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a civil detainee at Napa State Hospital who filed this civil rights action while 18 detained in the Solano County Stanton Correctional Facility. Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a 19 complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 20 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This action is referred to the undersigned United States 21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). For the following 22 reasons, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; however, the undersigned 23 recommends that this action be dismissed as frivolous, without leave to amend.

I. In Forma Pauperis Application

25 Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and prison trust account statement that make the 26 showing required by 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.