Strojnik
Strojnik v. Griffin
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20191:18-cv-01619California385 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PETER STROJNIK, SR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01619-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
ANITA GRIFFIN, et al., ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Defendants. (ECF No. 21)
TEN DAY DEADLINE
17 Peter Strojnik, Sr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se in this action, filed a complaint against Anita Griffin and Greg Griffin (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act and California law. (ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2019, Defendants’ answer was stricken as a sanction for failure to comply with court orders and default was entered. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) Plaintiff was ordered to file a motion for default judgment within sixty days of June 25, 2019. (Id.) More than sixty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed a motion for default judgment or otherwise responded to the June 25, 2019…