Strojnik

Strojnik v. Griffin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20191:18-cv-01619California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER STROJNIK, SR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01619-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ANITA GRIFFIN, et al., ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (ECF No. 21)

TEN DAY DEADLINE

17 Peter Strojnik, Sr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se in this action, filed a complaint against Anita Griffin and Greg Griffin (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act and California law. (ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2019, Defendants’ answer was stricken as a sanction for failure to comply with court orders and default was entered. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) Plaintiff was ordered to file a motion for default judgment within sixty days of June 25, 2019. (Id.) More than sixty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed a motion for default judgment or otherwise responded to the June 25, 2019…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.