Lozovoy

(PC) Randolph v. Lozovoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20191:16-cv-01528California5,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:16-cv-01528-DAD-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF’S

R. LOZOVOY, et al., CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

GREWAL AND CHEN BUT DENIED AS Defendants. TO PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT LOZOVOY

14 (ECF NO. 49)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Colin Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. “This action now proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint on plaintiff’s claims against defendants Lozovoy, Grewal, and Chen, for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.” (ECF No. 14, p. 3). On January 15, 2019, Defendants filed a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.