(PS) Miner v. USA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20192:19-cv-01496California1,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADIHA MINER, No. 2:19-cv-01496 MCE AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBI, and CIA, 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. I. SCREENING A determination that a plaintiff qualifies financially for in forma pauperis status does not complete the inquiry required by the statute. The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.