Garcia
(PC) Jones v. Garcia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 Case No. 1:17-cv-01311-LJO-SKO (PC)
CHARLES B. JONES,
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER -
NOTICE AND WARNING OF Plaintiff,
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR GARCIA, et al.,
AN EXTENSION OF TIME
13 Defendants. (Docs. 34, 35)
SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff, Charles B. Jones, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on August 28, 18 2019 based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 19 34.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 20 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby 21 notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing the motion. 22 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance 23 with Local Rule…