Garcia

(PC) Jones v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20191:17-cv-01311California1,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 Case No. 1:17-cv-01311-LJO-SKO (PC)

CHARLES B. JONES,

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER -

NOTICE AND WARNING OF Plaintiff,

REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR GARCIA, et al.,

AN EXTENSION OF TIME

13 Defendants. (Docs. 34, 35)

SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff, Charles B. Jones, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on August 28, 18 2019 based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 19 34.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 20 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby 21 notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing the motion. 22 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance 23 with Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.