Finder
Finder v. Leprino Foods Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 JERROD FINDER, et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-02059-AWI-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY SHOULD v. NOT BE DENIED, SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST PHILIP A. LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, et al., DOWNEY FOR UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW, AND/OR PHILIP A. Defendants. DOWNEY’S PRO HAC VICE STATUS SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
18 On August 16, 2019, Plaintiff Jerrod Finder (“Plaintiff”) filed a Substitution of Attorney 19 seeking to substitute Philip A. Downey as his counsel of record in place of Morris Nazarian. 20 (Doc. No. 98.) 21 Substitutions of attorney are subject to the approval of the Court. L.R. 182(g). Local 22 Rule 180 governs admission of attorneys to practice before this Court and provides, in relevant 23 part, “[a]dmission to and continuing membership in the Bar of this Court are limited to 24 attorneys who are…