Acebedo
(PC) Castaneda v. Acebedo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 Case No. 1:16-cv-01562-LJO-SKO (PC) JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA,
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE
Plaintiff, AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR
OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 56)
Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
15 Plaintiff, Jesus Bonilla Castaneda, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on 17 August 29, 2019, based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing 18 suit. (Doc. 56.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 19 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court 20 hereby notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing the motion. 21 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance 22 with Local Rule 230(l). 23 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a…