Acebedo

(PC) Castaneda v. Acebedo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20191:16-cv-01562California1,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 Case No. 1:16-cv-01562-LJO-SKO (PC) JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA,

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE

Plaintiff, AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR

OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 56)

Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

15 Plaintiff, Jesus Bonilla Castaneda, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on 17 August 29, 2019, based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing 18 suit. (Doc. 56.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 19 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court 20 hereby notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing the motion. 21 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance 22 with Local Rule 230(l). 23 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.