Cooper

Cooper v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20191:15-cv-00648California3,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN COOPER, Case No. 1:15-cv-00648-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 4, 2019

HEARING

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 33-34, )

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the above referenced action on the grounds of qualified immunity. Plaintiffs did not file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. The Local Rule provides that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c). Accordingly, the Court shall vacate the September 4, 2019 hearing on the motion to dismiss and the parties are not required to appear on that date. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 28, 2015, Melvin Cooper, individually and as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.