Cooper
Cooper v. Brown
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20191:15-cv-00648California3,898 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MELVIN COOPER, Case No. 1:15-cv-00648-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 4, 2019
HEARING
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 33-34, )
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
18 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the above referenced action on the grounds of qualified immunity. Plaintiffs did not file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. The Local Rule provides that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c). Accordingly, the Court shall vacate the September 4, 2019 hearing on the motion to dismiss and the parties are not required to appear on that date. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 28, 2015, Melvin Cooper, individually and as…