Hyatt

Hyatt v. Brown

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20191:15-cv-00955California3,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOM HYATT, Case No. 1:15-cv-00955-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 4, 2019

HEARING

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 26-27, )

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the above referenced action on the grounds of qualified immunity. The plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. The Local Rule provides that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c). Accordingly, the Court shall vacate the September 4, 2019 hearing on the motion to dismiss and the parties are not required to appear on that date. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 24, 2015, Tom Hyatt (“Plaintiff”) filed this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.