Naftzger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACK CHURCH, Case No. 1:17-cv-00596-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER -

NOTICE AND WARNING OF

v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

J. NAFTZGER, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. (Doc. 43)

21-DAY DEADLINE On August 29, 2019, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 43.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing Defendant’s motion. 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Local Rule…