Unknown

(PC) Ramirez v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20192:19-cv-01391California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN RAZO RAMIREZ, No. 2:19-cv-1391 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a document entitled “Motion for Order.” (ECF No. 1.) Therein, plaintiff sought an order requiring the warden to release him from school and permit him to work. Because plaintiff failed to initiate this action by filing a complaint, the court ordered him to do so. (ECF No. 3.) The court further ordered plaintiff to either file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. (Id.) In a document filed here on August 27, 2019, plaintiff states that he will not file a complaint because he has learned that he must first exhaust his administrative appeals through the prison. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff seeks to stay these proceedings so that he can complete the administrative appeal process. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.