Johnson v. City of Atwater

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20191:18-cv-00920California6,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD DEAN JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00920-DAD-SAB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT DEOL LAKHWINDER’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CITY OF ATWATER, et al., (ECF Nos. 16, 19, 22) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

CITY OF ATWATER,

Counterclaimant,

v.

RICHARD DEAN JOHNSON, et al,

Counter-Defendants.

21 Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson1 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Lakhwinder Deol’s motion for summary judgment which has been referred to the undersigned. (ECF Nos. 16, 21.) Having reviewed the record, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g).

1 For ease of reading, the Court shall refer to the plaintiffs by their first names when referring to the individual …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.