Johnson v. City of Atwater
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20191:18-cv-00920California6,433 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICHARD DEAN JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00920-DAD-SAB
Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT DEOL LAKHWINDER’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CITY OF ATWATER, et al., (ECF Nos. 16, 19, 22) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
CITY OF ATWATER,
Counterclaimant,
v.
RICHARD DEAN JOHNSON, et al,
Counter-Defendants.
21 Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson1 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Lakhwinder Deol’s motion for summary judgment which has been referred to the undersigned. (ECF Nos. 16, 21.) Having reviewed the record, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g).
1 For ease of reading, the Court shall refer to the plaintiffs by their first names when referring to the individual …