Tuman
(PC) Richardson v. Tuman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 PAUL RICHARDSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01166-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
R. TUMAN, et al., TO PROSECUTE
14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE
17 Paul Richardson (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on August 28, 2018. (ECF No. 1). On February 19, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 15). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to “notify the Court in writing that he does not wish to file a First Amended [C]omplaint and is instead willing to proceed only on First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendant Tuman and Defendant…