Hyatt
Hyatt v. Brown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 TOM HYATT, Case No. 1:15-cv-00955-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ALL PENDING
MATTERS AND DIRECTING CLERK
v. OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND
REFLECT VOLUNTARY
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF Defendants. CIVIL PROCEDURE
(ECF Nos. 26, 30, 31)
17 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on July 25, 2019. (ECF No. 26.) On 18 August 30, 2019 a findings and recommendations issued recommending granting 19 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 30.) On this same date, a stipulation was 20 filed to dismiss this action with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and 21 attorney fees. (ECF No. 31.) 22 In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. 23 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 24 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of…