Hanlin
Hanlin v. Armo
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENISE LYNN HANLIN, No. 1:19-cv-00076-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
LANCE E ARMO, LAW OFFICE OF LANCE E ARMO, (Doc. 25) 15 Defendants. 16
17 On August 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 25.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Sheila K. Oberto Dated: September 2, 2019 /s/ .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28