Gastelo

(HC) Sutter v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20191:19-cv-01091California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON CARL SUTTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01091-SKO-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND

TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT

v. [Doc. No. 7]

J. GASTELO, Warden, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO SUBSTITUTE J. GASTELO AS

Respondent. RESPONDENT IN THIS MATTER

16 On August 12, 2019, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named the People of the State of California as Respondent in this matter. On August 22, 2019, the Court advised Petitioner that he had failed to name a proper respondent. Petitioner was granted leave to file a motion to amend to name a proper respondent. On August 30, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name J. Gastelo as Respondent in this matter. Petitioner has named the proper respondent since J. Gastelo is the warden at his institution and he has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.