Sivas

Sivas v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20191:19-cv-00537California2,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DR. HAROLD C. SIVAS, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-00537-LJO-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (ECF NO. 11)

v.

LUXOTTICA RETAIL NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ASHLEY JONES; LIZ TORRES; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

I. BACKGROUND1

Plaintiff Dr. Harold C. Sivas filed this action on March 25, 2019 in Fresno County Superior

Court. ECF No. 1-1 (“Complaint”). On June 12, 2019, this Court granted without prejudice Defendants’

23 1 Unless otherwise noted, the facts are taken from the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 10. For 24 purposes of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, all alleged material facts are construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Coalition For ICANN Transparency, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 611 F.3d 495, 501 25 (“FAC”) on July 1, 2019. ECF No. 10. Defendant Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. (“Luxottica”)

operates Target Optical retail stores in space…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.