Tate

(PC) Franklin v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20191:19-cv-01170California2,470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY FRANKLIN, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01170-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

) HAROLD TATE, et al., [ECF No. 1] ) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Jeffrey Franklin is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the instant action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 26, 2019. On August 28, 2019, the action was transferred to this Court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on July 26, 2019, is before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.