Cappel

(PC) King v. Cappel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20192:18-cv-00389California2,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED KING, No. 2:18-cv-0389 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R.W. CAPPEL, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has paid the filing fee. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.