Badger

(PC) Bland v. Badger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20191:19-cv-00702California663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-00702-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT ALL CLAIMS v. BE DISMISSED, EXCEPT FOR PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST

M. FLORES, et al., DEFENDANTS M. FLORES AND M.

STANE FOR DELIBERATE Defendants. INDIFFERENCE TO SERIOUS RISK OF HARM IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT; AGAINST M. FLORES

FOR HARASSMENT IN VIOLATION OF

THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AND

AGAINST M. FLORES AND M. STANE

FOR CONSPIRACY

17 (ECF NOS. 11, 13)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

20 Plaintiff, Joshua Davis Bland, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action in Kern County Superior Court on August 3, 2018. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.