Galang

(PC) Jackson v. Galang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20192:15-cv-01675California9,773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTUS VAUGH JACKSON, JR., No. 2:15-CV-1675-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M/ DATOR, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant, Dator, violated his eighth amendment right to medical care. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 117) arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, the undisputed facts demonstrate Defendant was not deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, and Defendant Dator is protected by qualifiedly immune. For the reasons discussed below, this Court finds Defendant is entitled to judgment in his favor as a matter of law. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s verified complaint against Defendant M. Dator. 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.