Custino

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ETUATE SEKONA, No. 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS F. CUSTINO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 118 and 127). 20 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on plaintiff’s verified first amended complaint. See ECF No. 55. Plaintiff names the following officers at Mule Creek State Prison as defendants: (1) Custino; (2) Angle; (3) Charon; and (4) Snow. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Custino was the floor officer on June 27, 2014. According to plaintiff, Custino ordered plaintiff to move to cell 142, but plaintiff complained that cell 142 was unsafe. Plaintiff alleges that he told Custino that cell 142 “is so dangerous for his life and safety.” While plaintiff…