Diaz

(PC) Perez v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20192:19-cv-01295California2,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR PEREZ, No. 2:19-cv-1295 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief was denied. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rule 302. For the reasons set for below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this action and recommends dismissal of this action without prejudice. I. In Forma Pauperis Application Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.