Mehl

(UD)(PS) Vij v. Mehl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20192:19-cv-01686California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAKESH VIJ, No. 2:19-cv-01686-KJM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN MEHL, Defendant. 16 On August 28, 2019, defendant Gaven Mehl, proceeding pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action from Yolo County Superior Court. ECF No. 1. Defendant also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. As explained below, the court REMANDS the case to the Yolo County Superior Court and DENIES as moot defendant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. When a “civil action . . . of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and (2) diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Under § 1331, district courts have federal question…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.