Reddy

(PC) Lipsey v. Reddy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20192:17-cv-01434California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., No. 2:17-cv-1434-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REDDY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 19, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, for the reasons explained below the court declines to adopt the findings and recommendations. Instead,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.