Uddin

(PC) Burton v. Uddin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20192:19-cv-01616California1,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENDALL BURTON, No. 2:19-cv-1616 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MESKATH UDDIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and plaintiff has consented to have all proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.