Vasquez

Vasquez v. Leprino Foods Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20191:17-cv-00796California804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAIAS VASQUEZ and LINDA HEFKE No. 1:17-cv-00796-AWI-BAM on behalf of al other similarly situated individuals, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PHILIP A. Plaintiffs, DOWNEY’S PRO HAC VICE STATUS SHOULD

NOT BE REVOKED

v. LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, et al.,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 17 On June 12, 2017, this matter was removed to this Court from the Superior Court of California for the County of Kings. (Doc. No. 1.) On December 20, 2018, Philip A. Downey, counsel for Plaintiffs Isaias Vasquez and Linda Hefke, was admitted to appear and participate in this case pro hac vice. (Doc. No. 33.) Local Rule 180 governs the admission of attorneys to practice pro hac vice in this Court. Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2),

“Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or an Act of Congress, an attorney is not eligible to practice [pro hac vice] if any one or more of the following apply: (i) the attorney resides in California, (ii) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.