Denning

(PC) Cato v. Denning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20191:19-cv-00951California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CATO, JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00951-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS M. DENNING, et al., (ECF Nos. 10, 11) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff James Cato, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 23, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Denning and Hillman, in their individual capacity, for violation of Plaintiff’s right to receive mail under the First Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims. (ECF No. 10.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to file either a first amended complaint or a written notice informing the Court that he is willing to proceed only on the cognizable claim. (Id. at 5.) On September 3, 2019, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.