Armstrong

Armstrong v. City of Fairfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20192:19-cv-01325California736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JESSICA ARMSTRONG, Case No. 2:19-cv-01325-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., Defendant. 15 On July 16, 2019, plaintiff Jessica Armstrong filed a complaint against the City of Fairfield and two Fairfield police officers. Compl., ECF No. 1. Armstrong also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. IFP App., ECF No. 2. Plaintiff submits a declaration attesting to her inability to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); IFP App. After reviewing plaintiff’s application, the court finds she has alleged poverty with sufficient particularity and GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). Upon granting an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the court is required to screen the complaint to determine whether it is “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.