Burns
(PC) Howell v. Burns
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 1:19-cv-00556-JDP
Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v. THAT PLAINTIFF BE PERMITTED TO
PROCEED ON COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND
J. BURNES, et al., THAT NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
16 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 7, 2019, I screened Howell’s complaint and found that he stated an excessive force and a First Amendment claim against defendant Burnes, as well as a deliberate indifference claim against defendant Magallanes, but no other claims. See ECF No. 9. That order gave Howell three options: (1) proceed only on the claims found cognizable, (2) amend the complaint to add additional facts to make out additional claims, or (3) stand on the current complaint subject to dismissal of claims and defendants. On…