Kernan

(PC) Anderson v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20191:19-cv-01048California996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01048-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

KERNAN, et al., (Docs. 2, 3, 10)

Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Hector Clarence Anderson, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 2, 10.) Plaintiff’s applications should be DENIED since Plaintiff has three strikes under § 1915 and his allegations fail to show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. II. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. “In no event shall a prisoner

27 1 Plaintiff also filed a motion to order prison officials to provide a certified copy of his inmate trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.