Kernan
(PC) Anderson v. Kernan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01048-LJO-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
KERNAN, et al., (Docs. 2, 3, 10)
Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Hector Clarence Anderson, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 2, 10.) Plaintiff’s applications should be DENIED since Plaintiff has three strikes under § 1915 and his allegations fail to show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. II. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. “In no event shall a prisoner
27 1 Plaintiff also filed a motion to order prison officials to provide a certified copy of his inmate trust…