Schumaker

(PC) Alford v. Schumaker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20192:16-cv-01305California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PATRICK ALFORD, No. 2:16-CV-1305-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCHUMAKER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are the following motions: (1) plaintiff’s second and third motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 37 and 43); (2) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 38) to file a reply to defendants’ answer; and (3) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 42) to respond to defendants’ discovery requests. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a reply to defendants’ answer will be denied because the rules do not contemplate such a pleading. Plaintiff’s reply to defendants’ answer, filed on June 27, 2019 (ECF No. 41), will be stricken. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to respond to defendants’ interrogatories and requests…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.