(PS) Moreland v. Raytheon Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLORIA ETTA MORELAND, No. 2:19-cv-00906 MCE AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RAYTHEON COMPANY Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On July 15, 2019, this court issued an order granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordering plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. This deadline passed without any filing from plaintiff. On August 21, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. The court warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. Plaintiff has not provided any response. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed,…