(PS) Selck v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20192:18-cv-02447California3,478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:18-cv-2447-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;

CARLENA TAPELLA,

14 Defendants.

16 Several motions are pending in this action, which are addressed herein1: 1. Defendant Carlena Tapella’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) (ECF No. 6); 2. Tapella’s motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) provisions set forth in California Civil Procedure Code section 425.16 (ECF No. 7); 3. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 20 & 22); 26 27 This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.