Canlas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FLYNN, Case No. 1:16-cv-01052-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

CANLAS, et al., ECF No.

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 I. Background Plaintiff David Flynn (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was a prisoner at the time this action was initiated. This action proceeds against Defendant Maddox for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for falsification of medical appeals responses. On September 14, 2018, Defendants Maddox filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because there are no genuine issues of material fact, and Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.1 …