King

(PC) Walker v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20191:16-cv-01665California1,357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER WALKER, Case No. 1:16-cv-01665-AWI-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

v. MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TIM POOLE, et al., (ECF NO. 104) Defendants.

13 Roger Walker (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a “notice of motion for amended complaint and motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 104). The motion is one page. Attached to the motion is a copy of an Office of Patients’ Rights complaint form that Plaintiff filled out. It appears that Plaintiff wants to add two defendants due to a recent incident, as well as a request for injunctive relief against these defendants. Courts “should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “[T]his policy is to be applied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.